MACAU: ANOTHER ATTEMPT AT QUID PRO QUO?

10/30/08 02:15PM EDT
Last week, Macau’s Chief Executive, Edmund Ho, proposed enabling legislation on Article 23 of the Macau’s mini-constitution. This article states that “Macau shall enact laws, on its own, to prohibit any act of treason, secession, sedition, subversion against” the Beijing government. The law, if passed, would be a major blow to free speech in Macau. It’s not a half court shot to assume that Beijing would be pleased.

We believe the law is likely to pass although it is by no means a slam dunk. Government officials tried it in Hong Kong five years ago but pro-democracy forces put the full court press on and stymied it. Macau is a different place without the democratic and freedom roots dug so deep as in Hong Kong.

Aside from supporting our pro-capitalism and pro-freedom teammates around the world why do we care? Mr. Ho is likely making this proposal for one or two of the following reasons:

• Curry favor with Beijing for a cushy job at the end of his stint as CE of Macau late next year
• Another attempt at a quid pro quo with Beijing regarding loosening visa restrictions

I don’t care much about what team Mr. Ho plays on in 2010 but any loosening of the current Guandong visa restrictions could spark a rebound for Macau casinos.

I doubt Macau will put up the same fight as Hong Kong
© 2024 Hedgeye Risk Management, LLC. The information contained herein is the property of Hedgeye, which reserves all rights thereto. Redistribution of any part of this information is prohibited without the express written consent of Hedgeye. Hedgeye is not responsible for any errors in or omissions to this information, or for any consequences that may result from the use of this information.