prev

A ‘Must Read’ on an Underappreciated Issue

I can assure you that almost no one I talk to considers the Employee Free Choice Act a big deal. My Partner Todd Jordan has been all over this one. Here’s a ‘must read’ excerpt from his lodging note this morning that has implications across every industry. People in retail (including me) are looking at higher imported inflation, but are they looking at domestic employee wage pressure as unions rebuild after years of shrinkage? You can bet that Wal*Mart is looking seriously at this...
Brian McGough
“We will pass the Employee Free Choice Act. It’s not a matter of if, it’s a matter of when.” – Barack Obama

“Madam Speaker, I rise today in support of the Employee Free Choice Act, because the right to organize is essential to the path to prosperity for all Americans.” – Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi

“Every single Senator ought to support this bill.” – Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid

These quotes should remove any doubt. If Obama is elected President, the Employee Free Choice Act will become law. Whether or not the removal of secret ballots in deciding union elections makes employees more free is not important. Since 1989, unions have contributed almost $500 million to political campaigns. Over 90% of that cash has gone to Democrats. The favor will be paid back by an Obama administration and a Democratic congress.

So what does this mean? The elimination of secret ballots will make it much easier to unionize. Secret ballots are the cornerstone of any modern democracy for a reason. People can vote without the pressure that an open petition would apply. More unions = higher wages and benefits for hotel, casino, and leisure companies to name just a few.

Todd Jordan
Managing Director

Early Read: Good Sports Apparel Numbers

Sports apparel sales continue to look good, despite the malaise out there in retail-land. The latest Sportscan numbers (for the week ended Sunday) were +5.2%. Trailing 3 week trend (which I think is far more relevant) is trending higher for $$, units and ASP. Better on the margin for FINL, FL, DKS and HIBB.

FREE EMPLOYEES, NIX THE SECRET BALLOT

“Madam Speaker, I rise today in support of the Employee Free Choice Act, because the right to organize is essential to the path to prosperity for all Americans.” – Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi

“Every single Senator ought to support this bill.” – Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid

These quotes should remove any doubt. If Obama is elected President, the Employee Free Choice Act will become law. Whether or not the removal of secret ballots in deciding union elections makes employees more free is not important. Since 1989, unions have contributed almost $500 million to political campaigns. Over 90% of that cash has gone to Democrats. The favor will be paid back by an Obama administration and a Democratic congress.

So what does this mean? The elimination of secret ballots will make it much easier to unionize. Secret ballots are the cornerstone of any modern democracy for a reason. People can vote without the pressure that an open petition would apply. More unions = higher wages and benefits for Restaurants, hotel, casino, and most leisure companies.

Todd Jordan
Managing Director

For the restaurant industry, labor costs have been a significant issue for years. At this point in the cycle, there is no reason to assume that these labor cost increases are going away. Instead, the mandated increase in minimum wage, coupled with the Employee Free Choice Act could accelerate labor cost pressures for all restaurant companies.

Something to think about.......

get free cartoon of the day!

Start receiving Hedgeye's Cartoon of the Day, an exclusive and humourous take on the market and the economy, delivered every morning to your inbox

By joining our email marketing list you agree to receive marketing emails from Hedgeye. You may unsubscribe at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in one of the emails.

Read Through From JNY Miss

JNY puked the quarter. So now what? Here’s my take on other names that are likely to be arbitrarily taken out back and shot this morning. JNY, LIZ, RL, VFC, PVH… More to come.

Despite my view that the consumer would not notice if half of JNY’s portfolio ceased to exist, I was not expecting such a meaningful 3Q miss. In tearing it apart, it’s interesting to see that sales were decent enough relative to expectations – with no sequential erosion in aggregate versus 2Q levels. Gross margins were quite good, actually, as the company continues to decimate its moderate apparel business. But unfortunately it delivered SG&A by over 300bp. I think that the current management team is doing the right thing by investing in a portfolio that has long been ignored and undercapitalized by the former CEO. Unfortunately, keeping such discipline makes for painful deleverage on the way down. Even more unfortunate is that my confidence that JNY’s EPS will ever poke its head above $1.00 is close to nil.

I’m less concerned about JNY this morning as I am with how the market will take the rest of the group out back and shoot before aiming. Some will be justified, while others will not. Here are a few standouts…

1) LIZ: forever JNY’s top comp, it is almost a mathematical certainty that LIZ will trade down today. I’m buying into that. The key part of the LIZ story that people don’t seem to appreciate is that the company is cutting capex – potentially in half in FY09 – as it slows growth meaningfully and corrects margin. With a 42% SG&A ratio – to JNY’s 28% and industry norm of 35% -- we should see cash flow accelerate meaningfully in FY09. I like this name at current levels.

2) RL: Am I increasingly worried about wholesale sales? No. But Europe (near 1/3 of sales) is more of a concern for me given the sheer uniformity we’ve seen across Europe across all consumer spending categories (note Burberry on Monday). I still think that numbers are too low for RL, but my confidence level in the ‘smoking expectations factor’ has come down a notch. If RL simply hits the consensus, then even though it is sub-6x EBITDA that’s not cheap relative to other names in this new valuation paradigm.

3) VFC: VFC is unlikely to tank the quarter on Friday. Jeans business is hanging in just fine, Outdoor business is losing share on the margin to Columbia in the sporting goods channel, but is being shifted to TNF’s company-owned stores (which scare me). Acquisitions help this quarter as well. But starting in 4Q there WILL be a meaningful deceleration in top line due to acquisitions and FX, and cash flow compares get much more difficult. I still don’t understand how this name trades at 6.5x EBITDA in that context (several notches above all else). Is it the 3.7% div yield? I have to admit that I like that. But I’m still not owning this puppy at these levels.

4) PVH: Likely to get shot this morning. Given earnings risk associated with core men’s shirt and dress furnishings businesses, it should. I’m not comfortable going near this name without a 20% hit.

More updates later…

Trust Is Earned, Not Appointed

Don't tell people how to do things, tell them what to do and let them surprise you with their results.
~ George S. Patton

For you military history buffs, you’ll recall that Patton was plenty aggressive and controversial. His nickname was actually “Old Blood and Guts”. However, the man was a winner and didn’t have finger pointing in his arsenal of leadership weapons. Letting people be good is my interpretation of the quote above. That’s what winners do.

In order to let people be good, you have to trust them. As importantly, they need to trust you… so you better have an objective and flexible investment process that they can believe in. When trust is violated, teams, relationships, and systems start to break down. If there is one thing that I am seeing in the daily trading expressions of this market, it’s just that – the ultimate challenge to the trust that has been embedded into the American Financial system’s nucleus.

Yesterday’s US trading action was a crystal clear example of impaired trust. Paulson’s bailout plan was always earmarked for his banking buddies, and now the Street is having a hard time swallowing what the foxes will do now that they have the cash in the hen house. “Old Blood and Guts” would have blown up the hen houses, but these are much more politically polarizing times. Blowing things up isn’t cool. US market trading volume reflects that counterparties do not trust one another – it balloons on market down moves and dries up on the “bottom is in” CNBC sponsored rallies. Volatility, as measured by the VIX, remains in nosebleed territory at north of 55, and I think it could very well see 70 again before this war of attrition is all said and done.

The distrust in the American system is clearly not local. To borrow my favorite “Investment Banking Inc.” quote of October of last year, “it’s global this time”, indeed. Even after seeing the biggest cash injections in world history, LIBOR (the rate at which banks lend to one another) won’t budge. If it drops by 25 basis points, that might help the perpetually bullish narrative’s rhetoric, but it won’t do a darn thing for what matters out there on the battlefield – trust.

Tonight, we will watch the final US Presidential Debate. The “Question” on my mind is can the American people genuinely trust what I am now going to start calling “BAmerica”? If the answer to that question is yes, then we have a very positive macro catalyst on the calendar tee’d up for November. For some time now I have been saying that Obama is negative for the market’s immediate “Trade”, but the next macro call may very well lie in answering for duration as to whether or not his new administration could be positive for the intermediate “Trend.” There is no math in the driving factor in that model – just trust.

Do American investors trust Asian and European markets? That answer was yes – today, as regionalism and protectionism rears their ugly heads into the local economic dialogues, the answer is far less clear. In some cases it’s flat out scary. That’s why we shorted Austria’s (via the EWO) ETF yesterday (see note titled, “Eye on Regionalism: Austria's Spreading Xenophobia”, 10/14/08). We are going to be long countries looking to broaden their wings and incorporate free market trade and capitalism into their process. We trust those principles. We are going to be short close minded companies and countries who don’t get it.

The Chinese are starting to make moves towards capitalism. Are they in any way, shape, or form like Jack Welch’s definition? Of course not. But the point is that everything that matters in economic models happens on the margin. On the margin, they are more capitalistic than they have ever been. Unfortunately, I can’t say the same for the USA. Tonight, both Obama and McCain’s populist economic re-regulation rants will remind you of as much. Ronald Reagan these two politicians are not.

Of course, we are long China, and we will be getting longer via our ETF positions in the EWH and FXI this morning. We are short socialist Japan after re-shorting the EWJ yesterday, and we are also short the bureaucrats in India via the India Fund (IFN). India has a Presidential election that is coming up that will make the US populist calls to action look like Shrek. This is going to be the hard core socialist stuff that’s X-rated for we free market folks. India was the worst performing market in Asia overnight, closing down another -5.8%. We are looking at an immediate downside target on the BSE Sensex Index that is 11% lower. I do not trust asymmetric political tail risk.

Overall, I am a bit cheerier these days. Hopefully you are picking up on that in my notes. I definitely don’t want my son Jack to grow up in a neighborhood where his friend’s parents are calling us a family of “old blood and gut” bears. Both my team and yours should not trust an investment process that is perpetually negative. I would not have had a career in this business if I was never bullish. That said, I moved back to 80% cash and 20% stocks yesterday. For the immediate term “Trade”, I don’t trust that the current said leaders of this country get it. However, I am looking forward to November’s changes in the lineup.

Best of luck out there today,
KM



FREE EMPLOYEES, NIX THE SECRET BALLOT

“We will pass the Employee Free Choice Act. It’s not a matter of if, it’s a matter of when.” – Barack Obama

“Madam Speaker, I rise today in support of the Employee Free Choice Act, because the right to organize is essential to the path to prosperity for all Americans.” – Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi

“Every single Senator ought to support this bill.” – Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid

These quotes should remove any doubt. If Obama is elected President, the Employee Free Choice Act will become law. Whether or not the removal of secret ballots in deciding union elections makes employees more free is not important. Since 1989, unions have contributed almost $500 million to political campaigns. Over 90% of that cash has gone to Democrats. The favor will be paid back by an Obama administration and a Democratic congress.

So what does this mean? The elimination of secret ballots will make it much easier to unionize. Secret ballots are the cornerstone of any modern democracy for a reason. People can vote without the pressure that an open petition would apply. More unions = higher wages and benefits for hotel, casino, and leisure companies to name just a few.

Margins are going down over the next few years and not just because the top line is under pressure. Sorry to pick on Starwood but the hotel industry is pretty easy to analyze in this regard. The consensus EBITDA margin estimate for HOT declines only 80 basis points in 2009. With likely RevPAR declines of at least low to mid single digits, this projection is laughable. A note to analysts: labor costs are going up not down.

Daily Trading Ranges

20 Proprietary Risk Ranges

Daily Trading Ranges is designed to help you understand where you’re buying and selling within the risk range and help you make better sales at the top end of the range and purchases at the low end.

next