Conclusion: We expect the current debt ceiling debate to heat up substantially in the coming weeks, resulting in a measured pickup in volatility across global financial markets, primarily as a result of increased volatility in the US Dollar being driven by the whims of D.C. politicking. Further, we expect the debt limit to be increased prior to any sort of default on any of the federal government’s obligations. And within that legislation, we would expect to see the groundwork laid for potentially meaningful fiscal reform ahead of the FY12 budget debate – an event that is likely to prove dollar bullish when it’s all said and done.
Position: Short the US Dollar (UUP); Long Gold (GLD).
With the debt ceiling debacle looming over the horizon, we thought we’d use the opportunity to equip you with an in-depth guide for navigating the next 3-4 months of what is likely to be heightened volatility for global currency, bond, and equity markets. Even as QE2 expires in June, macro markets are likely to continue to gyrate on the whims and words of a few “inspired” politicians within our nation’s capitol.
In short, while we accept the consensus belief that the debt ceiling will eventually be extended prior to any sort of default on the US government’s obligations, we do believe the events and rhetoric leading up to the passage of any deal will be anything but “smooth sailing”. As such, we are in the process of taking down our gross and net exposure within the Hedgeye Asset Allocation Model and Virtual Portfolio due to our expectation of heighted volatility in the months ahead. Below we explain the drivers of said volatility via an in-depth analysis of the current political situation and previous debt ceiling impasses.
Hitting the Ceiling: Congress created the statutory federal debt limit in the Second Liberty Bond Act of 1917 as a result of negotiations which resulted in securing financing for WWI and creating an additional check on the fiscal power of the executive branch/ruling party. While federal debt is appropriately divided between debt held by the public and intra-governmental debt, nearly all of it is subject to the limit. The powers that be at the time of creation appropriately intended the debt ceiling to be a reoccurring opportunity to reassess the direction of the US’s fiscal policy. It is, however, not without limitations, as the current consequences of not increasing the debt ceiling almost always outweigh the current consequences of extending it, making it quite toothless from a policy making point of view.
Creating Headroom: As indicated in Treasury Secretary Geithner’s most recent letter to Congress on May 2nd, we are scheduled to hit the current $14.294T debt limit on this upcoming Monday, May 16th. As such, Geithner & Co. must take “extraordinary measures” to ensure the US government has enough cash on hand to navigate the timing of cash flows in order to fulfill its existing obligations.
The first trick in his bag of is to declare a “debt issuance suspension period”. This allows him to suspend (until further notice) the issuance of State and Local Government Securities, prematurely redeem existing Treasury securities held by the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund, suspend the issuance to that fund as investments, and suspend the daily reinvestment of Treasury securities held by the Government Securities Investment Fund of the Federal Employees Retirement System Thrift Savings Plan. In addition, he may be forced to suspend the daily reinvestment of Treasury securities held as investments by the Exchange Stabilization Fund. For the sake of brevity, we’re not going to explore in this report the exact technical mechanisms by which these measures contribute to freeing up headroom under the debt ceiling, as the net result of each step is overwhelmingly benign as it relates to the economy and financial markets. For all those interested in digging into these processes a bit more, we are happy to follow up with you.
All told, in conjunction with “higher than expected tax receipts”, the aforementioned measures are expected to extend the Treasury’s borrowing authority until “roughly” August 2nd under current projections for financing needs ($738B through the September 30th end of FY11 as of April 27th). The Treasury has asked for a $2 trillion hike in the debt limit to accommodate financing through FY12 under current budget projections.
After the ceiling is hit on or around that date, the US government will begin to default on its obligations absent an increase in the debt ceiling or some form of temporary legislation exempting new issuance from being counted towards the statuary debt limit. What is being made clear by Geithner’s letters to Congress is that he considers any failure to pay any of the US government’s obligations (not just interest payments and principal redemptions on Treasury securities) as a detriment to the full faith and credit backing America’s hand shake. While we don’t often agree with the man, we do find common ground on this principle and we believe the vast majority of Americans would agree. Below is a list of federal government liabilities that would be directly impacted should the debt ceiling not get raised in time:
- US military salaries and retirement benefits;
- Social Security and Medicare benefits;
- Veteran’s benefits;
- Federal civil service salaries and retirement benefits;
- Individual and corporate tax refunds;
- Unemployment benefits to States;
- Defense vendor payments;
- Student loan payments;
- Medicaid payments to States; and
- General operational expenses for federal government facilities.
Net-net, the sheer breadth of this list alone gives us conviction that Congress will ultimately enact a permanent increase in the debt ceiling or at least kick the can down the road by temporarily upping the limit to accommodate borrowing needs through the either the remainder of FY11 or CY11. Of course, as with all of life’s many destinations, it’s the journey there that matters most. Given that, we offer the next section as a guide for the road ahead.
Political Stakes: Since 1960, Congress has passed legislation which increased (permanently or temporarily) or revised the definition of the debt ceiling 78 times – 49 times under Republican presidents and 29 times under Democratic presidents. So while it may seem like reaching the debt ceiling is a big deal at face value, in reality, increasing the debt limit is quite a common occurrence.
Judging by the political posturing and partisan rhetoric being thrown around Capitol Hill currently, however, we expect this round of Piling Debt Upon Debt to be anything but commonplace – especially with characters like Boehner and Reid leading the charge. The next few months will be full of enough headline-worthy news quotes, political posturing, brinksmanship, and enough fear mongering to rattle global financial markets. As we outlined at the beginning of the year, the 112th Congress is among the greatest risks to global financial stability. This summer we expect them to prove us right in spades.
As such, we’ve compiled recent quotes from politicians on either side of the aisle in an effort to outline the strategies and goals of each party in the upcoming negotiations. While paraphrasing would indeed save time and space, we find their messages better delivered by actually “YouTubing” these bureaucrats at face value. Also, if we’ve learned anything from the near government shut down we’ve recently experienced several weeks back (over just $38.5B in “reported” budget cuts), it’s that neither side is afraid to send us to the edge of chaos in order to advance their political agenda.
- 5/9: Charles Schumer, Chairman of the Senate Rules Committee, NY: “Mr. Boehner needs to have an adult moment here and now… This next speech by the Speaker will be a litmus test on whether House Republicans plan to finally approach the debt ceiling as adults. So far many of them have not been responsible about this issue at all.”
- 5/9: Roger Altman, Chairman of Evercore Partners, former Treasury Secretary under Clinton, and consultant of Sen. Schumer: “Markets could crash if it begins to look like Congress will allow a default.”
- 5/10: Kent Conrad, Senate Budget Committee Chairman, ND: Unveiled a budget proposal which called for a 50-50 split between spending cuts and tax increases. The plan was immediately rejected by Republicans.
- 5/10: Jay Carey, White House Press Secretary: “It is folly to hold hostage the vote to raise the debt ceiling to prevent the United States of America from defaulting on its obligations to any other piece of legislation… Maximalist positions do not produce compromise.”
- 5/10: Chris Van Hollen, MD: “We have identified some areas of common ground [in today’s bipartisan meeting]. The major areas of disagreement have not yet been engaged.”
- 1/7: Mike Huckabee, former Governor of AR: “One of the things that gives a little bit of juice for the Republicans is that Senator Barack Obama in 2006 stood on the Senate floor with an impassioned speech, saying that we should not raise the debt limit, that it was the lack of leadership, and that George Bush was just completely derelict in duty by asking Congress to raise the debt limit… Mr. President, we certainly don’t think you’ve made this radical change in just a few years, so we’re going to take you up on it.”
- 5/5: John Boehner, Speaker of the House, OH: “Instead of talking about billions [of budget cuts], I think it’s time to start talking about trillions. They should be actual cuts and program reforms, not broad deficit or debt targets that punt the tough questions into the future... Nothing is off the table except raising taxes.”
- 5/5: Mitch McConnell, KY: “We face a crisis that makes the panic of 2008 look like a slow day on Wall Street.” Still, McConnell suggested to the Senate floor that he would only vote for an increase in the debt limit in exchange for “deep and permanent” cuts in federal spending.
- 5/5: Steve King, IA: “I’d put the cutting off of all funds to ObamaCare on that debt ceiling bill and say, there’s going be no raising of the debt ceiling here by the House of Representatives unless we shut off all funding that is going to implement or enforce ObamaCare.”
- 5/5: Paul Ryan, WI: “[Spending] caps in and of themselves, alone I don’t think our conference would accept that. The GOP wants a down payment of spending cuts… Knowing that we are very far apart between the president, the Senate and where we are, we are not under any illusion that we’re going to get some grand- slam agreement… getting a single or double instead of a home run is the goal of the talks… Tax increases are off the table and triggers for automatic tax increases are a cop-out for those who cannot cut spending.”
- 5/9: John Boehner, Speaker of the House, OH: “To increase the debt limit without simultaneously addressing the drivers of our debt – in defiance with the will of our people – would be monumentally arrogant and massively irresponsible. It would send a signal to investors and entrepreneurs everywhere that America still is not serious about dealing with our spending addiction... It’s true that allowing America to default would be irresponsible, but it would be more irresponsible to raise the debt ceiling without simultaneously taking dramatic steps to reduce spending and reform the budget in the process.”
- 5/9: Michael Steel, Spokesman for Boehner: “The American people flatly reject Senator Schumer’s call for a blank check for the Democrats who run Washington to keep their spending spree going. There’s no way an increase in the debt limit will pass without real spending cuts and reforms.”
- 5/11: Eric Cantor, House Majority Leader, VA: “The substance of [Tuesday’s] discussions was trying to focus in on areas where we can cut spending and cut it big.” He affirmed house support for Boehner’s recent demands for trillions of dollars in budget cuts, saying “Anything less is not serious”.
- 4/10: Sarah Palin, former VP nominee and Governor of AK: “There needs to be an understanding in the GOP leadership that we cannot provide another tool for the liberals to just incur more debt, and that’s what raising the debt ceiling is going to allow again.”
- 5/9: Michele Bachmann, MN: Recently stated that any vote to raise the debt ceiling must be attached to a bill fully de-funding ObamaCare. She also criticized Boehner for “squandering” an opportunity to cut spending in the latest continuing resolution.
- 5/9: William Temple, Head of this fall’s Tea Party National Convention: “We’re telling Boehner and all of the House Republicans they came into office with Tea Party help. We now expect them to keep their promises and hold the ceiling on the national debt.” He added that the party would support a small increase if it were to be accompanied by a major policy win such as the repeal of ObamaCare.
All in all, the gaping divide between the two ideologies on what it would take to collectively lift the debt ceiling by early August is omnipresent in their recent commentary. While it’s clear that some fiscal reform will be included in any legislation towards increasing the debt ceiling (US dollar bullish), it’s almost equally as clear that: a) it will fall short of current Republican demands (US dollar bearish) because the Democrats are, on the margin, willing to stand their ground and engage in this game of political brinksmanship (evidenced by GOP leaders backing away from their recent support of Paul Ryan’s Medicare reform plan); and b) as political brinksmanship inches us closer to the deadline, we are likely to see a measured increase in fear-mongering quotes that are likely to be the source of much consternation for global financial markets.
As such, we anticipate a broad-based pickup in volatility, given the heighted Correlation Risk we’ve seen across all asset classes to date. This tug-of-war on the US dollar is an acute risk that needs to be managed around, particularly from a timing perspective. In short, the playbook is as follows: Republican compromise = dollar DOWN; Democrat compromise = Dollar UP. Gaming Policy is about to get a little more challenging in the coming months.
Below we briefly touch upon prior debt limit impasses and how key financial markets fared in the months leading up to and just beyond the eventual increases. Keep in mind that the charts below are not at all an attempt to forecast what might happen in the coming months; like history itself, no two debt ceiling periods are alike. Rather, the illustrations below are merely points of reference for pondering how the markets will react this time around.
1985: In September of 1985, the Treasury Department became unable to issue new securities as a result of the statutory limit on federal debt being reached. As such, it was forced to take “extraordinary measures” consisting of and similar to the maneuvers listed in the section above. The debt limit was temporarily increased on November 14, 1985 and permanently increased on December 12,1985 from $1.82T to $2.08T. In addition, the accompanying legislation granted the Treasury Department authority to declare a “debt issuance suspension period” in future debt limit impasses.
1995-96: On November 15, 1995, the Treasury Department declared the first ever “debt issuance suspension period” and used “extraordinary measures” to finagle its way through the beginning of the next year. It subsequently notified Congress that it did not have enough cash on hand to pay the March 1996 Social Security benefits, at which point Congress responded by temporarily increasing the debt limit in an amount commensurate to the upcoming benefit distribution ($29B). Just one day before the March 15th deadline, Congress acted to extend the temporary increase by two weeks until March 30th. And just one day before that deadline, Congress passed legislation permanently increasing the debt limit to $5.5T from $4.9T.
2002-03: At several instances during this two year period, the Treasury Department had to declare “debt issuance suspension periods” (April 4, 2002-April 16, 2002; May 16, 2002-June 28, 2002; and February 20, 2003-May 27, 2003) and take “extraordinary measures” to smooth the timing of cash flows in order to meet the federal government’s obligations. The debt limit was permanently increased twice during this legislative impasse; first on June 28, 2002 to $6.4T from $5.95T and subsequently on May 27, 2003 to $7.38T.
While we expect the US dollar to find a bid at some point in the coming months due to the market eventually looking through this impasse to the increased likelihood of meaningful fiscal reform in the intermediate term, we do think the weeks leading up this occurrence will provide another opportunity for the global currency market to vote against the short-term political compromises we continue to see out of Washington D.C. If anything, this exercise will continue to expose to the world just how far away both sides are from agreeing on a credible solution to the #1 issue driving the US’s long-term fiscal and balance sheet deterioration – entitlement spending. Over the near term, we expect the tough choices to continue to get punted to future sessions; as such, we remain short the US dollar and long Gold in the Virtual Portfolio – for now. That will most likely change in the coming months.
Sources: US Department of the Treasury, CBO, Government Accountability Office, The Hill.com, Fox News, Congressional Research Service, and National Association of State Budget Officers.